📢 Gate Square Exclusive: #WXTM Creative Contest# Is Now Live!
Celebrate CandyDrop Round 59 featuring MinoTari (WXTM) — compete for a 70,000 WXTM prize pool!
🎯 About MinoTari (WXTM)
Tari is a Rust-based blockchain protocol centered around digital assets.
It empowers creators to build new types of digital experiences and narratives.
With Tari, digitally scarce assets—like collectibles or in-game items—unlock new business opportunities for creators.
🎨 Event Period:
Aug 7, 2025, 09:00 – Aug 12, 2025, 16:00 (UTC)
📌 How to Participate:
Post original content on Gate Square related to WXTM or its
The controversy surrounding KOLs in the encryption circle has sparked reflection: market influence and regulatory challenges.
The Controversy of KOLs in the Crypto Assets Field: Market Manipulation or Misunderstanding?
Recently, two well-known KOLs in the Crypto Assets circle have attracted widespread attention due to some controversial events. These events not only exposed some potential market manipulation behaviors but also provoked thoughts on the role and influence of KOLs in the Crypto Assets ecosystem.
The Dispute Between Lexapro and Moonshot
Lexapro is a KOL with a certain influence in the meme coin circle and is believed to have close ties with the "Water Pipe Gang". Recently, he has been involved in a controversy regarding the $RICH token related to the Moonshot platform.
According to the exposed chat records, Lexapro and Moonshot employee sidewinder have differences regarding the market performance of the $RICH coin. Lexapro accuses Moonshot of failing to fulfill their commitment to support the coin's price, while sidewinder counters that this is Lexapro's own project, and Moonshot is not responsible for boosting the price.
In the dispute, Lexapro threatened that the fate of Moonshot depended on the other party's attitude, which raised more questions. Although Lexapro later claimed to have also lost on $RICH, many still believe this was a failed "conspiracy scheme".
This incident not only affected the $RICH community but also undermined the confidence of the entire Crypto Assets community. Many investors felt disappointed and angry because they believed in and invested in this project, only to discover that there may have been improper dealings between KOLs and the platform.
Charges Faced by GCR
Another well-known KOL, GCR, faces more serious accusations. It is claimed that GCR profited from insider information obtained through illegal means, including bribing a certain trading platform to get insider information about coin listings and hacking into research institutions' servers to access report contents in advance.
However, these allegations currently lack solid evidence. Some have released suspected chat records of GCR on Discord, but their authenticity and context have not been verified. Others have defended GCR, claiming that these screenshots may originate from an earlier incident of fraud allegations.
It is worth noting that the whistleblower stated that he received doxxing and death threats. Although he believes this is unrelated to GCR himself, it may be the work of some fanatic fans. This reflects that in the Crypto Assets community, some KOLs have achieved an almost idol-like status and influence.
Reflection
These events have once again sparked people's reflections on the role of KOLs in Crypto Assets. While KOLs can provide information and perspectives for investors, excessive reliance on their opinions may pose risks. Every investor should develop the ability to think independently and not blindly follow anyone's advice.
At the same time, these controversies highlight the importance of regulating the Crypto Assets market. How to prevent market manipulation and insider trading while maintaining innovation is a significant challenge faced by regulatory authorities.
Overall, these events remind us that in the opportunity-filled world of Crypto Assets, it is equally important to remain alert and cautious. KOLs can provide valuable insights, but the real investment decisions must rely on one's own judgment.